Daniel Tutt

Those of us that work on psychoanalysis and theory are often hacks. My primary foray into the field has been around applying psychoanalysis to politics, ethics, and theory more generally. It’s well known that there exists a conflict amongst practicing analysts, especially amongst the clinical Lacanians about what Zizek has done to Lacan. Their main point of dispute stems from the feeling that he de-emphasizes the clinical technicalities of psychoanalysis and bastardizes some of Lacan’s teachings. Zizek is a blessing and a curse because he is bringing so many people into the Lacanian field but sacrificing some of the clinical weight of Lacan. I won’t get into the specifics of Zizek’s differences with Miller, but they are interesting and most of it revolves around psychoanalysis’ institutionalization and the question of the bodily real and semblance.

In this post I want to share my experience in psychoanalysis because if you know…

View original post 1,637 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.